Thursday, March 5, 2009

Biotechnological Architecture

The new book published by Rizzoli is an incredible collection of everything conceived by Greg Lynn since he started his solo career, both built and unbuilt. It is a thick one, and the high percentage of full-page, full-color photographs and renderings is misleading because the text is so tiny. It actually ends up being a fairly hefty read.

Each of the various projects is treated to fascinating description.  Fans of Lynn will no doubt be familiar with some of them from his previous writings, but there's now so much more to talk about. There's also some more in-depth architectural theory penned by Lynn himself. In addition to this, though, are short pieces of startling variety that have influenced the work shown, from the thoughts of BMW designer Chris Bangle to the science-fiction of J.G. Ballard. One of the more confusing inclusions, because its rhetoric would seem so very foreign to those in architecture or a related creative field, is a longer piece titled "Structuralist Research Program in Developmental Biology" by Brian C. Goodwin. This one has obvious connections to Lynn's work, dealing with how genetics dictate the creation of simplistic biological forms like cylinders (worms, snakes, intestines). But its length and terribly dry, mind-bendingly clinical biological phrasing--complete with more than a couple typos--makes its inclusion in a publication devoted to design seem a bit incongruous.

Going through each aspect of Lynn's aesthetic approach one by one, it's especially interesting that this collection covers more of the mechanical technologies, so integral to his work, than any text I'd found before. The ways that computer numerically controlled fabrication and knitting machines have informed his design process is given a very satisfying amount of explanation. The update as far as works that wouldn't have been underway in previous volumes on or by Lynn and the final section--a catalogue of everything he's done in a comprehensive, chronological list--make this wholly worth the price. The impeccable styling of the binding and graphics that I've mentioned before are merely an added bonus.

In honor of the publication of this valuable monograph, I'd like to talk about a project of his close to my heart and to my apartment. Many people who ride the Long Island Railroad will be familiar with the Knickerbocker Laundry by architect Irving M. Fenichel (1892-1970). It's a beautiful Art Moderne structure built in 1932, and had always been a favorite building of mine. Unfortunately, there seems to be not a single image publicly available online of what it looked like before its transformation. Before moving into an apartment just several blocks from it, as cool as I thought it was, I never would have made the journey to try to find it to photograph it myself.

Going over there the day I did was like going on an Arctic expedition. Snow had fallen, melted, and frozen again. Half of the surfaces I traversed hadn't been shoveled or salted to begin with. That day the ice was still thick but in the process of melting again, so the sheets of ice were about as slippery as buttered Teflon. I'm still grateful I didn't fall and crack my head open, which I was at risk of doing on numerous occasions.

Speaking of ice, according to historian Christopher Gray, Knickerbocker had been an ice dealer. When mechanical refrigeration became much more popular in private homes, they needed to diversify, and moved into air conditioning units and also a centralized laundry. They built this laundry facility next to their ice plant. It had what sounds like a very impressive domed (or vaulted) solid bronze vestibule and black and gold marble and black glass Art Deco interiors. The Naarden Perfume Company bought the building around 1970, Gray says, but it had sat vacant after 1986, when Unilever acquired Naarden and moved them to New Jersey.

It's now the New York Korean Presbyterian Church, having gotten a complete transformation by Greg Lynn FORM in 1999. Really, the best place to be to view the building is on the LIRR, and this was done on purpose for visibility for the laundry. Here's the view from the other (my) side of the tracks:
Click images for larger views.
--All images ©2009, Ryan Witte. As always, if you're interested in using any of them, please feel free to contact me.
Likely due to it having started as a working-class suburb populated by families who couldn't afford cars at first, Sunnyside is filled with these rows of one-story garages presumably built a bit later when the residents became more affluent. They're used by the homes behind or, in this case, across the street from them.


My mother, who knows the bible backwards and forwards, said that in context, this verse is an oddly unwelcoming choice for the front-façade motto of the church. It was no doubt chosen because of the proximity of the train, which flies by at high speed.





Despite its angled orientation parallel to the LIRR track, depriving the building of a rectangular footprint, the original front façade is strictly symmetrical. Lynn played with that, however, by moving his gridded metal entrance screen off to the right of center. I'm reminded of something he said during the talk with Peter Eisenman. Studies have shown that the faces of people we find the most attractive are not precisely symmetrical, he said, but faces that are a lower percentage--I can't remember the exact figure--around 89% symmetrical or something. In any case, after reading this, Lynn became fascinated by the idea of near-symmetry.




I really adore these Art Moderne end pavilions. To quickly summarize, this whole architectural period is now considered to fall under the umbrella of Modern Classicism. My own approach to explaining it is a gradual flattening of ornament from the Neo-Classicism of the early twentieth century to the completely flat and ornament-free Modernism of the 1940s (in the United States). So falling under this are Art Deco using flattened industrial and vaguely Egyptian relief ornamentation, Modernist Expressionism as in the Chrysler Building (and let us not forget the brilliant Erich Mendelssohn), and Art Moderne, which is sort of the last hurrah of this progression: an enthusiastic embrace of new ideas of Streamlining. I'll spare you all my theories on Streamlining as it relates culturally to the Great Depression. 



The administrative offices are housed in the original structure. The sanctuary is built onto the roof of the old factory floor. This soaring glass entryway near center leads to a slightly serpentine corridor that cuts through the renovated spaces to the opposite (eastern) side of the building. Off this corridor are many of the worship and auxiliary rooms, including the main sanctuary.



Look closely: there's a bird.
Under this incredibly sculptural canopy is a grand staircase leading to and from the sanctuary. This was off hours, so there was no light on inside for me to photograph it myself. I will say, though, that when I walked into this great room, I very literally could not breathe properly for nearly a minute. It is one of the most astonishing spaces I have ever seen. It inspires reverence without question.

This lower level parking lot was literally like an ice rink. The best way I could find to not kill myself was to walk along the tracks carved out by vehicles before it'd frozen solid. I'm not litigious in the slightest, but it really seemed like a lawsuit waiting to happen.



Knickerbocker Laundry/ New York Korean Presbyterian Church
Irving M. Fenichel, 1932/ Greg Lynn FORM, 1999

©2009, Ryan Witte

Monday, March 2, 2009

Adssassinations

I recently came across some of the most brilliant work I've seen in a long time--unfortunately not in person, but I've had my eyes peeled since. I described him elsewhere as a "guerrilla collagist," and he goes by the alias, Poster Boy. 


Self-Portrait 2, all works shown here circa early 2008

I thought he'd be a great person to interview, and I was right; I found him to be an exceptionally eloquent conversationalist, as you'll see. Coincidentally, his work and some of the things we discussed are surprisingly timely in regards to the controversial arts funding in the government bailout and other things I've been talking about here. In addition, though it was wholly unintentional, Public Art has become a bit of a recurring subject here on Architextures. I've expressed my adamant support for those doing public art and why in previous posts, but I do consider it a noble cause. For your enjoyment, here's my interview with Poster Boy.


Self-Portrait
Ryan Witte: My first question has to be, are you the real Poster Boy, or are you an imPoster?

Poster Boy: Everyone has a little Poster Boy in them. Some have more than others.

RW: Because of a couple of clues, I have this suspicion that you went/go to the School of Visual Arts, where I went to college. You don't need to comment on that, but was/is there anything about the institution of college you think was/is not what it should have been?

Gov't Cheese
PB: You have a good eye for detail. I'm assuming you're referring to the "irony" note on one of the flickr shots. Tuition is a bitch and the text books are the overpriced heels she dons (I'm trying to be funny, not sexist). But it should come as no surprise because the educational system is a business operating within a capitalist framework. I don't think I was ever aware or prepared for that stark reality. Even though there are many things I'd have liked to change, there is nothing I regret. Everything I've been through has lead me to where I am.

RW: Normally I'd ask about an artist's studio or materials, but that doesn't really apply to you. Are you restricted by the time of day? In other words, I imagined that the best time to do what you do would be at three or four in the morning, not when I'd feel terribly productive, myself. You also seem to choose some fairly busy subway stops. Do you otherwise tend to like out-of-the-way stops that don't see a lot of foot traffic?



Poor, Odors, and Mind Your Manners
PB: I don't have the time or the desire to be roaming around the underground during the wee hours of the morning. I've done many pieces during rush hour. It's easier to blend in when people are around you. There are some great out-of-the-way stops, but then you reduce the chance for people to appreciate the physical pieces.

Not a Movie
RW: How do the cops act, usually?

PB: They never get to see the magic happen, and I never stay long enough for their reaction.

NY Fart-a-Thon

RW: Have you had other people stand around and watch or do they mostly just give you a look and then go on with their commute?

PB: Some laugh. Some grimace. Most stand around and watch until their train arrives.

RW: Do some stops seem to get ads you like better than others?

Bushwick
PB: Not really, but I do notice that all the Equinox gym ads are in Manhattan. It's understandable. None of my friends in Bushwick have a membership.

Rubbish Removed
RW: Some might suggest that unless a work of art gets seen by an audience, it fails to ever really become alive, and that the larger that audience is, the more profound an affect or influence the work can have on our culture. On top of that, your work is inherently temporary, destined to be removed or destroyed. 

PB: I agree. I'd even go so far as to say that the viewer makes it art, not the artist.

RW: Approaching the visual arts as a form of communication, as I most certainly do, I'd have to think you're right. Of course, we then run into the problem that many viewers of abstract art, for instance, and for sure graffiti, have immediately made the judgement "that's not art." Possibly what they really mean, though, is that the piece isn't communicating with them, for whatever reason.

PB: Therein lies the beauty of art. The work exists as art to some but not others. However, both are right. Who am I to say the naysayers are wrong? If it isn't art to them then it isn't art. But as long as there's one person that believes it to be art then it exists as art. Once in a while there comes an artist that convinces most. Only time will tell what kind of artist, if any, Poster Boy is.
Your Mom Is Anti-Painting
RW: So where would you draw the line between becoming a tool of the commercial gallery art world and the importance that could have for carving out a place for yourself in the History of Art over the long term?

PB: On a long enough timeline, everyone disappears--some faster than others. The same applies to the artwork. You can use the best archival materials and techniques, but in the end it doesn't matter. I've always been impatient, so why not toss or recycle the work immediately? Our obsession with hoarding and amassing material objects stems from our fear of death and mistrust of nature. Besides, there's enough shit out there collecting dust. I would, literally, draw a line over [Takashi] Murakami's head.

RW: It's true that physical media has always been unavoidably degradable. But you bring up an interesting point here, because I'm tempted to wonder, in the Information Age, if anything ever disappears. I think of digital images, hosted and re-hosted, emailed and forwarded and hosted again, from network to network. If it were an embarrassing shot of me caught with my pants down, I'd fear it would exist forever in cyberspace. Even three-dimensional objects can be scanned, mapped extremely accurately, and converted into virtual objects composed of information, which conceptually, can never degrade.

PB: Doesn't virtual media rely on physical contrivances? 

RW: Well, yes, of course, although I suppose I mean that the internet as a whole entity doesn't really have a physical presence locatable in space. It only really exists as digital information floating around.

PB: Even the most sophisticated devices are subject to the laws of the universe. I'm no techie, but I'm sure there are, or will be, viruses that will introduce Murphy's Law to the virtual world. As for the "picture" with your pants down: it might outlive you, but as long as you had fun, who cares?

RW: I always try to be having fun when I have my pants down.

Suits
Does a work of art lose its integrity when it becomes a product and a commodity?

PB: It depends on the intentions of the artist and the taste of the viewer. If the sole intention of the artist is to make money, then commodification is desirable. The art is then a product, subject to supply and demand like any other market. Does it lose its integrity? That's up to the viewer.

RW: I have to believe everyone has a "price."

PB: You have the right to believe anything you want.

Enough Ads
RW: If some big, fat advertising agency said you could name your fee--any amount you want--to design a campaign for them, would you do it?

PB: I've had several very fat ad agencies approach me in hopes of marketing Poster Boy. Let's just say I won't be getting that follow-up interview. I'm willing to work with anyone, but on my own terms. I would love to work with those big wigs. My ideal campaign would be to light every billboard on fire for a new line of bullshit energy drinks. I can see the headlines now: "Advertising Genius or Asshole Arsonist?"

RW: [LOL] Not a fan of the energy drinks, huh?

New World (tap) Water
PB: Not a big fan of stuff I don't need.

Mossy Tiles 2
RW: What if the MTA asked you to do a mosaic scheme for the renovation of a station?

PB: ...I might do it, but it wouldn't be done as Poster Boy.


PB: I think they're very comforting. I found myself sitting on his "feet" many times while waiting for the A, C, E. I'm still waiting for him to design trains so they look like something out of Alice in Wonderland.

Corporate Talent
RW: One of your biggest targets seems to be the garbage foisted on us by Hollywood and mainstream television. If you go to the movies or get a DVD, what do you watch?

PB: Since I don't watch TV or listen to the radio, I usually go by word-of-mouth. I'm a sucker for a good love story and I like Campy, but I absolutely love bad movies. There's nothing better than laughing at scenes that aren't supposed to be funny. And remember, support your local movie pirate/bootlegger.

RW: Love stories are a bit of a surprise.

PB: People wouldn't normally associate Love with the kind of work Poster Boy produces. That mentality is part of what I'm challenging. In actuality, Love plays a huge role in what I do. Love is what gives me the courage to go out and make work regardless of the consequences. In a time when oligarchies are controlling the masses with fear, we have to realize that love for ourselves and our fellow man/woman is the only way to become free.

RW: That's a beautiful sentiment, really, and no doubt true. 

Rated-RO
I'm also not going to touch your piracy statement, but oh boy, do I ever love me some bad movies. Did you ever see Robot Monster? That one is so deliciously awful.

PB: Never seen Robot Monster, but I'm already digg'n the title. I'll have to check it out.

BS Media
RW: How are we brainwashed?

PB: Christ, where do I start? I'll just say that the plantation has grown exponentially since slavery. We're whipped by the media and our minds are shackled.

RW: Come on now, let's be honest; you don't trust the media, do you? 

Toulouse-Lautrec or Andy Warhol?

PB: Can't beat Lautrec's elegance, but Warhol gave the best interviews.

RW: I can totally hear his answers to some of my long-winded questions above: "Sure." "Yeah." "Okay."

Same Shit
Communism or Anarchism?

PB: Whichever allows us to coexist with the rest of planet earth.

It's Britney, Bitch!
RW: Are you the future of graffiti art?

PB: I'm content with being the present.

RW: [LOL] Great answer. 

If you've seen people's reactions to your pieces without them knowing you're the artist responsible...

PB: Yes...

RW: What's been the best reaction so far?

Piss Water
PB: The double-take during rush hour is always nice.

RW: Thanks for taking the time out for the interview, it's been very interesting speaking with you!

Nano After

©2009, Ryan Witte
The interview above is not intended to imply that the author endorses unlawful behavior.